Medical School Headquarters

Save $100! The Last Cohort of Our Group Coaching Program Starts 3/11! Join Here

<

Highlight & Takeaways

Session 142

This week, we continue on with our breakdown as we discuss Passage 7 of Blueprint MCAT (formerly Next Step Test Prep)’s full length 10 Psych/Soc.

Blueprint MCAT (formerly Next Step Test Prep)’s Clara is joining us again as we dive into group psychology which is huge on the MCAT. Particularly, this passage is about the bystander effect. It’s the idea of helping others under different circumstances.

[01:55] Passage 7

Researchers sought to investigate the impact context has on helping behaviors. In a seminary college, researchers conducted an experiment in which 42 student participants were told researchers were assessing their view and their performance on a task. Participants first completed measures assessing personality variables. The participants were then told they were to report to another building to give a talk on a topic. Half of the participants were told they would be giving a talk on being a Good Samaritan, a Biblical parable involving an individual who helps another person. The other participants were told to give a talk about employment for students. In addition, one-third of the students were told that they should hurry to the talk, one-third were told they had sufficient time, and one-third were told they had more than sufficient time to arrive.

Researchers planted a confederate, who appeared to be in distress, coughing severely and appearing to be in need of help. Participants encountered this individual on the way to their talk. Researchers observed and recorded whether or not the participant stopped to help this individual. Researchers classified helping behavior by type of talk (Samaritan or Occupation) and by the level of urgency (Hurry, Sufficient, More than Sufficient). The researchers found that the type of talk and level of urgency both significantly impacted helping behavior. The results are presented as follows.

Figure 1 shown. (Percent of participants who helped the confederate by type of talk and level of urgency)

[04:12] Question 37

Participants who did not help may have believed other students would help. What dynamic does this attitude represent?

(A) Availability heuristic

(B) Cognitive dissonance

(C) Differential association

(D) Diffusion of responsibility

Clara’s insights:

The correct answer here is D. As easy at it sounds, but it’s correct. It’s not a guarantee but it stands to your favor. With the bystander effect, part of it is the diffusion of responsibility.

Availability heuristic is a mental shortcut. This has the tendency to use information that’s available to us. So it’s not relevant here.

Cognitive dissonance refers to an uncomfortable mental state that people fall into when their behaviors and attitude don’t line up.

Differential association is a theory that relates to why certain people develop criminal tendencies. This is definitely not relevant here either.

[07:05] Question 38

Which of the following would NOT increase the likelihood of a participant helping the confederate?

(A) If participants viewed helping the confederate as being more rewarding than the talk

(B) If another individual expressed concern about the confederate

(C) The confederate appearing to be in a different school than the participant

(D) The participant being familiar with that area of campus

Clara’s insights:

The correct answer here is C. This is an example of a question where you don’t really need to know some terms. In fact, they can be answered with common sense. Here, you can think about the concept of ingroups vs outgroups. People in the same school would be the ingroup while the people different from their school would be the outgroup. And in general, we don’t really treat members of the outgroup as well as we would treat members of the ingroup.

[09:50] Question 39

According to the study, what effect might being told to give a talk on the Good Samaritan have had on participants?

(A) Decreased empathic response

(B) Priming effect of helping behavior

(C) Increased conditioned response

(D) Inhibition of startle response

Clara’s insights:

The correct answer here is B. Priming effect is where you present someone with some idea or visual. Then you ask them later, you can impact or lead their behaviors by priming them earlier. Startle response is just random. Increased condition response is related to classical conditioning.

[12:45] Blueprint MCAT (formerly Next Step Test Prep)

Check out MCATCourseReview.com to watch a video that I’ve done for Blueprint MCAT (formerly Next Step Test Prep)’s MCAT course. Get tons of videos and access to all ten of their full-length exams. Get access to live office hours everyday with one of their top reviewers. Use the promo code MCATPOD for $50 off.

Links:

MedEd Media Network

MCATCourseReview.com

Blueprint MCAT (formerly Next Step Test Prep) (promo code MCATPOD)

You might also like

loading

Uncertainty to Conviction: A Stanford MD/PhD’s Journey

Session 593 Navigating the uncertainty of a career in medicine is no small feat, as...

Why MCAT Scores & GPAs Won’t Make You a Great Doctor

Session 592 Join us for an engaging conversation with Dr. David Winchester, a distinguished cardiologist...

From High School to MD: Inside the BSMD Experience

Session 591 (00:01) Path to Medicine (11:22) Leadership, Time Management, and Transition (19:09) Medical School...

MCAT Anxiety, Gap Years, and the Journey to Medical School

Session 590 How does a budding interest in healthcare transform into a steadfast commitment to...

Never miss an episode!

Watch this video to learn how to subscribe to our Meded Podcasts.

What our listeners are saying

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit

Advisor Preference

Thank you for the info! Knowing if you have advisor preferences and who they are helps us make sure we have the proper resources to take care of every student who wants to work with us! This is not your official selection. After you sign up, you'll be sent a form to fill out!

Every one of our advisors were hand-picked by Dr. Gray and are all experts dedicated to helping you get into medical school. When you sign up, you'll receive an email to complete your official request about who you prefer and who might be a good fit. After you fill out that form, we'll get you set up!

Right now, Carlos Tapia, former Director of Admissions at TCU and former Director of Student Affairs at Icahn Mount Sinai, and Courtney Lewis, former Director of Admissions at Burrell College of Osteopathic Medicine are the two advisor who have remaining availability. Both are experts at helping their students get into great medical schools across the country, both MD and DO! Dr. Crispen and Deana Golini are available on a case-by-case basis for 20-hour package students. Remember, we're a small team and everyone on the team has amazing admissions experience and a proven track record of getting students into med schools across the country!