Medical School Headquarters

MCAT Summer Immersive Interest List Now Open | Be the first to know when registration is live

<

Highlight & Takeaways

Session 104

Today’s passage is all about brain training. Maybe it will help you with your MCAT CARS prep! Don’t forget to read the text first and then come back and listen.

As always, I’m joined by Jack Westin from JackWestin.com. Check out all their amazing free resources including a free trial session of Jack’s full course to see how it’s like learning from Jack Westin himself. Jack Westin has also just released the MCAT science passage of the day, where you will get a free MCAT science passage that mimics the exact style, feel, and logic of the real exam – every single day.

Listen to this podcast episode with the player above, or keep reading for the highlights and takeaway points.

Link to the article:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-brain-training-actually-work/

If there were an app on your phone that could improve your memory, would you try it? Who wouldn’t want a better memory? After all, our recollections are fragile and can be impaired by diseases, injuries, mental health conditions and, most acutely for all of us, aging.

A multibillion-dollar industry for brain training already capitalizes on this perceived need by providing an abundance of apps for phones and tablets that provide mental challenges that are easily accessible and relatively inexpensive.

The three of us, and many others, have provided evidence that carefully formulated exercises can improve basic cognitive skills and even lead to better scores on standard IQ tests. At the same time, brain training has become a profoundly controversial endeavor. Some researchers, including one of us, have expressed deep reservations about both its reliability and its validity. There was even a consensus statement issued calling brain training into question, which, in turn, resulted in a counter-response from researchers who defended it.

In the case of memory training, for instance, study results have been inconsistent, and even meta-analytic approaches that combine data across studies come to differing conclusions. Undoubtedly, there is an enormous amount of hyperbole surrounding the field with many companies exaggerating the potential benefits of using their apps.

The main controversies center around the extent to which the practice of these skills results in actual benefits that are consequential for your daily life. Does recalling an increasing number of digits help you remember to take your medication, do better on a school exam, remember the name of the person whom you met yesterday or even make better life choices?

[08:41] Paragraph 1, Sentence 1

If there were an app on your phone that could improve your memory, would you try it?

Jack says:

The theme of this article is really finding gray matter. It’s not all black and white as it may seem and you may have to find some gray area. So let’s go ahead and keep reading. It seems easy. The first sentence talks about improving your memories and it’s definitely something we all want to do.

[09:24] Paragraph 1, Sentence 2

Who wouldn’t want a better memory?

Jack says:

Another question that’s pretty straightforward.

[09:29] Paragraph 1, Sentence 3

After all, our recollections are fragile and can be impaired by diseases, injuries, mental health conditions and, most acutely for all of us, aging.

Jack says:

The author here is setting up a couple of questions as to whether you want to improve your memory and who wouldn’t want better memory. Then it’s basically stating that our memory being impaired is something we all face.

Usually, questions are something we have to look out for because they may pose a new argument and new idea. In this case, it’s a more general question about making sure we know memory is important.

[10:25] Paragraph 2, Sentence 1

A multibillion-dollar industry for brain training already capitalizes on this perceived need by providing an abundance of apps for phones and tablets that provide mental challenges that are easily accessible and relatively inexpensive.

Jack says:

The author here is saying that there is already this whole industry that tries to capitalize on this fear of losing your memory. They’re explaining a fact on what exists and we’ve all seen these apps.

[11:25] Paragraph 3, Sentence 1

The three of us, and many others, have provided evidence that carefully formulated exercises can improve basic cognitive skills and even lead to better scores on standard IQ tests.

Jack says:

The author is acknowledging that they are part of the study, or they’re the researchers involved. And it’s saying it could lead to better scores on standard IQ tests, which is similar to the MCAT although not exactly the same thing.

[12:41] Paragraph 3, Sentence 2

At the same time, brain training has become a profoundly controversial endeavor.

Jack says:

It’s so weird. It says “the three of us”  and you’re putting your name on it. You’re saying you believe it will lead to better scores. And now, you go on and say, actually, nevermind because it has some issues. That’s weird. And that confuses so many students. But that’s the whole point of this. Maybe the answer is not as black and white, as you may think. Maybe there is some gray area, and you just have to accept this.

A lot of times, students like to treat these articles like math problems. The answer is 20. The answer is 40. In this case, it could be 2 or 20 or 40. It is not just one answer. So that’s something everyone should get used to. Be more flexible and notice the gray area.

[14:17] Paragraph 3, Sentence 3

Some researchers, including one of us, have expressed deep reservations about both its reliability and its validity.

Jack says:

Not only are they potentially bringing up that there’s some controversy, but they’re also bringing up that one of the three also has some reservations, which is very interesting.

[14:41] Paragraph 3, Sentence 4

There was even a consensus statement issued calling brain training into question, which, in turn, resulted in a counter-response from researchers who defended it.

Jack says:

The author is just reiterating the battle of people who believe in it and don’t. And this ambivalence doesn’t really sit comfortably with students because the author has brought themselves up in both positions.

[15:13] Paragraph 4, Sentence 1

In the case of memory training, for instance, study results have been inconsistent, and even meta-analytic approaches that combine data across studies come to differing conclusions.

Jack says:

The author is diving into some of the data that it’s not as straightforward as they would maybe help.

[15:42] Paragraph 4, Sentence 2

Undoubtedly, there is an enormous amount of hyperbole surrounding the field with many companies exaggerating the potential benefits of using their apps.

Jack says:

The author here is admitting that there are companies exaggerating these benefits. You don’t have to conclude or assume anything, but visualizing this will help you better understand it. Now, probably because they’re selling something.

“We don't have to go too far. We don't have to make connections that aren't there. But it doesn't hurt to think about why the author is saying this stuff.”Click To Tweet

[16:23] Paragraph 5, Sentence 1

The main controversies center around the extent to which the practice of these skills results in actual benefits that are consequential for your daily life.

Jack says:

The author here is narrowing in on these arguments. Do these really help in your daily life? Or is this just some fun thing to keep your mind busy?

[16:56] Paragraph 5, Sentence 2

Does recalling an increasing number of digits help you remember to take your medication, do better on a school exam, remember the name of the person whom you met yesterday or even make better life choices?

Jack says:

The author is questioning how applicable it is. So you can have both. It could help your memory, but maybe not when it’s applicable to normal day-to-day routines. And that can both exist at the same time. The author isn’t really sure how these brain apps really make a difference in our lives. And that’s where the issue arises.

These are interesting things, and it’s okay if we don’t know the answer. It’s okay if the author ends with a question mark.

Links:

Meded Media

Jack Westin

Email jack@jackwestin.com

Link to the article:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-brain-training-actually-work/

You might also like

loading

Targeted List: 12 Schools, 2 Interviews, 2 Acceptances

Session 619 Omar didn’t rush into medicine—even with a nephrologist dad and physician relatives. In...

Payal, M4 at Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine

Session 27 What do you do when medical school makes you feel disconnected from your...

Chino, 3rd Year MD-PhD Student at Icahn SOM at Mount Sinai

Session 26 What does it really mean to commit to an eight-year training path? Join host Deana Golini as she interviews Chinoso Nwakama, a third-year MD-PhD student at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, who is currently deep in the research phase of his dual degree. Chinoso (Chino) shares his journey from rural Minnesota to the heart of New York City, explaining how the Flex Grad pipeline program allowed him to bypass the MCAT and focus on his passion for addiction research. He discusses the “double privilege” of wearing two hats, clinician and researcher, and how he maintains his medical knowledge while solely focused on molecular lab work. From running half-marathons in Central Park to his deep love for history, Chinoso’s story is a masterclass in enjoying the process of a long-term training path. If Chinoso’s journey provides the clarity you need for your residency path, like this video, share your thoughts in the comments, and subscribe for more insider blueprints for med school success! What You’ll Learn: The MD-PhD “Why”: Understanding the utility of dual degrees in translational medicine. Bypassing the MCAT: How Mount Sinai’s Flex Grad program provides an early assurance pathway for researchers. Addiction & Public Health: Chinoso’s research into substance use disorders and the neurodegeneration caused by chronic opioid use. The “Two Hats” Philosophy: Navigating the identity shift between seeing patients in the ED and working at the molecular level. Maintaining Clinical Edge: Strategies for keeping medical knowledge fresh during a 4-year PhD hiatus. The Humanities Connection: Why a passion for History and science outreach makes for a more well-rounded physician. Full show notes coming soon!

Ashley, M2 at New York Medical College

Session 25 What do you do when your medical school dreams and personal life collide?...

Never miss an episode!

Watch this video to learn how to subscribe to our Meded Podcasts.

What our listeners are saying

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit

Sale Ends In

Days

Two New Expert Advisors

Save 25% off and Work with Our Amazing New Advisors!

New Advisor